Behavioural Analysis of Organisations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Behavioural Analysis of Organisations - Essay specimenOrganisations are grouped into Mechanistic and Organic groups and this grouping is still relevant. In mechanistic organisations, tasks are disconnected down into specialisms, technicalities, methods, duties, powers related to positions and altogether behaviours and responses of workers are according to superiors decisions without much scope for individuality. These organisations are considered to be to a greater extent stable and vertically oriented.Organic organisations do not have very clearly pronounced power structure and instead, depend more on group decisions after interacting with people of diverse background within party framework. These organisations are considered to be more individualistic where people can make a positive percentage and are of democratic nature. While doing a study of this kind, both kinds of organisations are approached.Human behaviour is incessantly diverse and complex and unpredictable at time s. A person who is charming to the rest of the world, could be sheer(a) aggressive to people running(a) under him. Many times it is not surprising to come across hidden psychological problems that surface only when the person can dictate terms, and dormant otherwise. In new-fangled years, the necessity of a more psychological approach towards business organisations was felt and much study has bypast into this direction. Social Scientists are dedicating time to study worker behaviour, management behaviour, and formulate theories of change for the organisations to follow. Like the affinity between parents and children, the relationship between an organization and its members has aspects of both hate and love. Employees, passenger vehicle, owners, customers, and society-at-large find themselves both beneficiaties and dependents of the organization an origination that, though man-made, seems to have a lift of its own, Bobbitt et al (1978, p.4).With the globalisation, organisatio ns found it necessary to undergo unprecedented changes, for working with hitherto alien cultures and facing unfamiliar situations. Today solutions and decisions are made by people of diverse background and organisations have to see that all the decisions go in favour of the business. It has become imperative that veritable guidelines should be laid down for all workers and managers to follow in spite of the cultural and background differences. Niccolo Machiavelli is considered to be the main political philosopher who spoke of leadership and organisational power. Max Weber followed him in discussing charismatic leadership. Psychology, after second base World War has become the main subject and organisations have created the norms of judging organisational developments from human resources angle. Whether a manager defaults or whether he succeeds depends on large measure on his understanding of organizational behaviour and all its complexities. Although organizations appear to take o n a life of their own, they remain inventions of man, says